The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

The draft is underway!

Click here to go to your war room, or visit the war room item in the draft menu.

League Forums

Main - Suggestion Box

Re: Suggested changes to volatility

By ColonelFailure
1/04/2024 2:11 pm
Volatility is incredibly important to the health of the game - the opportunity for a probably high-value player to fall short, or an overlooked rookie to excel in the pro game is vital to keep rosters a little off-balanced.

The problem is that, at present, volatility is a one-time deal. Rookie training camp is the make-or-break for every player, after that, their future is set. Bust at TC? Never going to have a career. Boom, and you just won the lottery.

My suggestion has two components, either of which make it far more interesting and less prone to being all-or-nothing.

1. Make the volatility direction of travel coin-flip every season, not just at rookie training camp. That way, a player who busts in their rookie year may rebound in subsequent seasons, until they reach their final evolution. The same would also be true in reverse - that lucky roll in year 1, could get a catastrophic result in year 2. This would also reinvigorate the free agency market as players look to improve their chances of a pro career even if they came up short rookie year.

2. Expand the impact of volatility. Make it apply in game situations as well. This way it becomes a measure of the temperament of the player. A roll against volatility before each game could boost their playing stats by up to 10%, decrease them in a similar way, or have no effect. Volatile players become wild cards, low volatility become dependable. You could take it a step further and allow league admins to set the min/max change in stats allowing a league where volatility could be WILD set to 100%, or a non-factor, setting it to 0%.

These measures won't change the season outcome. The best-run rosters will still take home the silverware, but it'll add a little more variance into how games work out. It'll also avoid rookie trading camp being an all-or-nothing event.
Last edited at 1/05/2024 3:57 am

Re: Suggested changes to volatility

By frank
1/04/2024 11:37 pm
comment above is best suggestion i have ever seen here

Re: Suggested changes to volatility

By Rialto
1/10/2024 10:09 am
ColonelFailure wrote:
Volatility is incredibly important to the health of the game - the opportunity for a probably high-value player to fall short, or an overlooked rookie to excel in the pro game is vital to keep rosters a little off-balanced.

The problem is that, at present, volatility is a one-time deal. Rookie training camp is the make-or-break for every player, after that, their future is set. Bust at TC? Never going to have a career. Boom, and you just won the lottery.

My suggestion has two components, either of which make it far more interesting and less prone to being all-or-nothing.

1. Make the volatility direction of travel coin-flip every season, not just at rookie training camp. That way, a player who busts in their rookie year may rebound in subsequent seasons, until they reach their final evolution. The same would also be true in reverse - that lucky roll in year 1, could get a catastrophic result in year 2. This would also reinvigorate the free agency market as players look to improve their chances of a pro career even if they came up short rookie year.

2. Expand the impact of volatility. Make it apply in game situations as well. This way it becomes a measure of the temperament of the player. A roll against volatility before each game could boost their playing stats by up to 10%, decrease them in a similar way, or have no effect. Volatile players become wild cards, low volatility become dependable. You could take it a step further and allow league admins to set the min/max change in stats allowing a league where volatility could be WILD set to 100%, or a non-factor, setting it to 0%.

These measures won't change the season outcome. The best-run rosters will still take home the silverware, but it'll add a little more variance into how games work out. It'll also avoid rookie trading camp being an all-or-nothing event.


... QB Josh Rosen is alive

Re: Suggested changes to volatility

By mlowe
1/26/2024 8:14 am
I agree that the one-time boom or bust is a flaw. That's not necessarily how it goes in real life (although it could).

What if instead of re rolling every year though, it re rolled after a coaching change, maybe even after x amount of time with a new coach? Or after signing with a new team?

In real life, a draft "bust" sometimes find motivation with a new coach or team. Or, a draft "boom" might really struggle with a new coach or team.

Just a thought.

Re: Suggested changes to volatility

By Mcbolt55
1/26/2024 10:14 am
Could even be tied to the supposed push to make coordinator/position coaches matter. Maybe that already happens and we just don’t know it. Each player has a certain “best” or “worst” system or playbook they fit into, but it’s a secret?